- Mon Jul 24, 2017 2:50 pm
#37600
Hi, Pamela,
Very good insight here. Yes, (D) and (E) do present a challenge, but let's differentiate between the two to determine why (E) is the credited response.
First, focus on the "action" verb that introduces these answer choices. This is a specific purpose question akin to asking "why" the author does something, or what purpose this excerpt serves in her overall argument.
(D) starts with "provide additional evidence."
(E) starts with "illustrate."
What is the author trying to accomplish here? Is she trying to give another data point, or is she trying to elaborate/explain a feature of her argument. Given the choice, the LSAC would likely argue for the latter.
Second, note the topic of each answer choice.
(D) concerns primarily whether prosperity can be quantified.
(E) concerns the "economists' position."
Given the evidence in the passage (line 52 "the economists' stance can be likened"), it is likely that (E) provides a better match for the function of this particular excerpt.
Last, note the strength of language, "cannot be quantified," in answer choice (D). The author's argument might not properly be understood to mean that prosperity "cannot be quantified" but rather that the quantification of prosperity poses difficult challenges. Note that the author does discuss how natural beauty even has some obvious monetary value to people who choose to live in beautiful areas even though they could make twice their salaries in nearby cities.
Thus, answer choice (D) includes a slight distortion of the author's thesis.
I hope this helps!