- Tue Nov 14, 2017 7:25 pm
#41599
Hi JM,
This question is asking for which answer is least compatible with Bettelheim's views.
As explicitly stated in the passage, Bettelheim views fairy tales as cautionary, instructive stories for children, who learn that acting on their bad impulses will lead to (literal) punishment, implying that they cannot distinguish between reality and fantasy. Their parents' need are to be valued over theirs, as their impulses are viewed as inherently bad.
Answer choice (E) says that children cannot distinguish between fantasy, like that presented in fairy tales, and reality. This is an assumption of Bettelheim's claims, necessary to show that fairy tales exist as cautionary examples to children who take their meanings and the negative outcomes for misbehaving children literally. So (E) is not only compatible with, but necessary for Bettelheim.
(B) is correct because it links fairy tales to children's development of their own self-importance, whereas Bettelheim does the opposite. He sees fairy tales as useful for parents to keep their children in line, thus subordinating children's wants and needs to that of their parents.
Hope this helps!