- Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:51 pm
#3844
Hi guys,
This question relates to the Oct 2000 Lsat, Section 1, Q20. The stimulus is:
Premise: Current maps showing North American regions where different types of garden plants will flourish are based on weather data gathered 60 years ago from a few hundred primitive weather stations.
Premise: New maps are compiled using computerised data from several thousand modern weather stations and input from home gardeners across North America
Conclusion: These new maps will be far more useful.
The question is a strengthens, except. Is the rationale for the correct answer (b) that it merely establishes that some of the 'modern stations' are the same stations used to collect data for the old/current maps, and thus *at worst* it weakens the conclusion since it suggests that *at least some* of the data is no better than that used for the previous maps, and *at best* it has no effect on the conclusion, since the 'modern stations' that are not the same as those used in the old maps + the new data from home gardeners *may still be sufficient* to make the conclusion true.
I'm not sure if my logic here is right. Thanks for the help!
This question relates to the Oct 2000 Lsat, Section 1, Q20. The stimulus is:
Premise: Current maps showing North American regions where different types of garden plants will flourish are based on weather data gathered 60 years ago from a few hundred primitive weather stations.
Premise: New maps are compiled using computerised data from several thousand modern weather stations and input from home gardeners across North America
Conclusion: These new maps will be far more useful.
The question is a strengthens, except. Is the rationale for the correct answer (b) that it merely establishes that some of the 'modern stations' are the same stations used to collect data for the old/current maps, and thus *at worst* it weakens the conclusion since it suggests that *at least some* of the data is no better than that used for the previous maps, and *at best* it has no effect on the conclusion, since the 'modern stations' that are not the same as those used in the old maps + the new data from home gardeners *may still be sufficient* to make the conclusion true.
I'm not sure if my logic here is right. Thanks for the help!