- Thu Apr 26, 2018 5:39 pm
#45268
Khodi7531,
Thanks for the question! As you are aware, the first key is to understand what Burke's fear was - you were looking in the exact right place. The passage reads:
"Any country could enact a patrimony (20) law stating that anything ever made within the boundaries of that country is its cultural property. Burke expressed the fear that widespread reclamation litigation would lead to ruinous legal defense costs for museums."
To restate, Burke's fear was that a law passed by a country that anything made in the country is cultural property could lead to widespread litigation that would lead to excessive legal defense costs. So we are looking for an answer choice that is an example of this fear.
Looking at the answer choices, (C) fits the bill really well: "the passage of a law by another country declaring that all objects created by its aboriginal people are the sole property of that country." It slightly narrows the definition from all objects to those made by aboriginal people, but otherwise, it is the exact fear that Burke warns of. It is an example of a law widening the connection between where something was made to whose property it is, which was Burke's exact fear. If anything, answer choice (B) (an international accord establishing strict criteria for determining whether a work of art can be considered stolen and specifying the circumstances under which it must be returned to its country of origin) would run counter to Burke's fear, as this kind of law would weaken the connection between where something was made and who owns it.
Hope this helps!
AB