LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 AthenaDalton
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 296
  • Joined: May 02, 2017
|
#38372
Hi Dlareh,

In answer choice (E), it is fair to read "should be preserved" as "ought to be preserved." However, this is still the author's opinion, and not a factual statement.

With regards to answer choice (A), the stimulus tells us that many important types of medicine have been developed from substances discovered in tropical plants. It's not necessarily the case that the scientists need to harvest large quantities of the plants themselves to produce the drugs, but rather that discovering a new chemical structure from a plant provides a useful starting point for new research. Therefore, if tropical forests are wiped out, there may be useful plants that go undiscovered by scientists.

I hope that makes sense. Good luck studying!

Athena Dalton
 lathlee
  • Posts: 652
  • Joined: Apr 01, 2016
|
#46317
Is this Q can be solve using Nested Conditional Reasoning? Cuz I see a nature of Nested Conditional in the question Stem.
 Adam Tyson
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5377
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2011
|
#63435
I'm not seeing anything in this stimulus that suggests a nested conditional, lathlee, as there is only one true conditional claim - if the forests are not preserved, then the medicines will not be developed. The rest of the claims are not conditional because they are not absolute - "many" and "very likely" are not conditional indicators. The stem gives no indication of anything conditional - it's just a plain assumption stem. You could use the conditional claim and its contrapositive to prephrase an assumption though: "if important medicines are developed, then we must have preserved the rain forests." The author assumes that preservation is required, that we cannot get those medicines somewhere else, like from the plants we have already studied and perhaps reproduced elsewhere such as in labs and greenhouses. That's not a nested conditional, but just a "plain vanilla" conditional claim.

If you are seeing something more, please share your proposed diagram of the relationship, and we will look it over and see if we can help further with this one. A nested conditional usually looks something like this:

A :arrow: (B :arrow: C)

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.