- Wed Jun 27, 2018 6:19 pm
#47108
Hi Deck,
This is a fairly difficult question as it relies upon remembering or identifying one key piece of evidence in the passage and applying an implication of that to the correct answer choice. Process of elimination (separating Losers from Contenders) should help here.
Answer choice (A) is something of an obvious trap. We know black schools improved relative to white schools, but are only given evidence of black school improvement, not white schools getting worse. Loser.
Answer choice (B) is a very specific fact, and for this reason should be left as a Contender on a first read (unless you remember clearly that the opposite is true).
Answer choice (C) goes against the idea of the disparity between white and black schools, and should be an immediate Loser.
Answer choice (D) is a mirror image of (A), albeit more attractive. Again, we don't know anything about how the quality of white schools did or didn't change, so we can't make this inference (although it is likely true).
Answer choice (E) runs into the same problem as (A) and (D), requiring knowledge we don't have about white schools to make an accurate comparison. Loser.
This leaves us with (B), but it still needs to be shown true. The evidence for it comes in lines 30-32:
"Although in the mid-1940s term length at black schools was approaching that in white schools"
This means the school terms were shorter in black schools, giving teachers in white schools more time to teach the material.
Hope this helps!