- Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:15 pm
#4938
Hello.
I am having issue with certain 'rules' in the linear setups. I am not sure if I will find these in other games; however, if so, I can be prepared now by getting this cleared up. If you look at page 3-21 (Game 4 Dec.1997), the next-to-last last rule states:
Lalitha performs third ONLY IF Norton performs fifth. .
I know that Norton is the Necessary condition based on the "only if" statement, but does this mean that "N" (Norton) can perform fifth as much as he wants (or whenever he wants) BUT that Lalitha does/does not HAVE TO perform third? In other words, "N" can perform 5th, but this DOES NOT MEAN that "L" is going to perform 3rd. I believe it means that if L performs 3rd-----N has to be in the 5th spot.
I have all three Bibles as well as the homework books (1-12). I had taken the virtual course in the past, but did not complete it. Is there somewhere I can look to improve on this types of "rules"? I know I have read this in the past, however;cannot recall the section. I know that I am confusing one condition for another; I know that a condition (S or N) can be in one place but this DOES NOT denote the other "has to be" there such as the example above.
Thank you.
Mark
I am having issue with certain 'rules' in the linear setups. I am not sure if I will find these in other games; however, if so, I can be prepared now by getting this cleared up. If you look at page 3-21 (Game 4 Dec.1997), the next-to-last last rule states:
Lalitha performs third ONLY IF Norton performs fifth. .
I know that Norton is the Necessary condition based on the "only if" statement, but does this mean that "N" (Norton) can perform fifth as much as he wants (or whenever he wants) BUT that Lalitha does/does not HAVE TO perform third? In other words, "N" can perform 5th, but this DOES NOT MEAN that "L" is going to perform 3rd. I believe it means that if L performs 3rd-----N has to be in the 5th spot.
I have all three Bibles as well as the homework books (1-12). I had taken the virtual course in the past, but did not complete it. Is there somewhere I can look to improve on this types of "rules"? I know I have read this in the past, however;cannot recall the section. I know that I am confusing one condition for another; I know that a condition (S or N) can be in one place but this DOES NOT denote the other "has to be" there such as the example above.
Thank you.
Mark