- Thu Nov 17, 2016 6:28 pm
#30653
I hope it's not too much to ask for a viewstamp analysis of this passage. I got three wrong and would like to make sure I understood it.
Viewpoints: I only see the Author's view here.
Structure: Paragraph1: Introduce Eileen Gray with a bit of a bio of her and sets out the topic of the passage, by saying that she moved from small objects and introduces lacquer. Paragraph 2: Paragraph 2 describes Gray's work and how her lacquer work helped define her aesthetics. Paragraph 3: tells us about her architectural work, the large object part of her work.
Tone: Is extremely impressed with Eileen Gray.
Argument: The argumentation is showing how Gray's work with lacquer influenced her work with ever larger objects.
Main Point: Even as Gray moved from working with small objects, to large she was attentive to the hidden details.
Is this all good?
Viewpoints: I only see the Author's view here.
Structure: Paragraph1: Introduce Eileen Gray with a bit of a bio of her and sets out the topic of the passage, by saying that she moved from small objects and introduces lacquer. Paragraph 2: Paragraph 2 describes Gray's work and how her lacquer work helped define her aesthetics. Paragraph 3: tells us about her architectural work, the large object part of her work.
Tone: Is extremely impressed with Eileen Gray.
Argument: The argumentation is showing how Gray's work with lacquer influenced her work with ever larger objects.
Main Point: Even as Gray moved from working with small objects, to large she was attentive to the hidden details.
Is this all good?