- Sat Aug 18, 2018 7:39 pm
#49781
The premise states that most of the the board of directors who set executives' salaries can expect to benefit from the generous benchmarks for those salaries. This is contrary to others who are convinced that they have the economic health of the corporation to safeguard which would prevent excessively large salaries.
Our task is to find the reasoning.
Answer choice D seems to fit this perfectly. The board members obtain an indirect financial advantage if they set the benchmark high which would increase salaries in the industry overall. The board members expect to become executives in the future, so this would suerly give them an incentive to increase salaries. The author's point seems to be well-made with Answer choice D.
Not sure what trap I fell into by not choosing C. Any suggestions?
Our task is to find the reasoning.
Answer choice D seems to fit this perfectly. The board members obtain an indirect financial advantage if they set the benchmark high which would increase salaries in the industry overall. The board members expect to become executives in the future, so this would suerly give them an incentive to increase salaries. The author's point seems to be well-made with Answer choice D.
Not sure what trap I fell into by not choosing C. Any suggestions?