- Wed Jun 23, 2021 11:53 pm
#88227
Hi everyone!
I am getting really annoyed with Weaken questions - I almost always get them wrong. I think it's because I focus too much on the idea that it need only weaken the reasoning a little but could weaken the reasoning a great deal.
So, I chose (C): Many people who use only behavior modification techniques to help them fall asleep have never used sleeping pills.
I'm thinking that, because the conclusion says that one (behavior modification techniques) is more effective than the other (sleeping pills), that (C) is wrong because it does not really tell us anything that may indicate that behavior modification techniques are not more effective than sleeping pills. So, while they may have never been tried by those who only use modification techniques, it could still easily be true that behavior modification techniques are more effective. Does that sound right?
Then, for answer choice (D): The people who are the most likely to take sleeping pills rather than practice behavior modification techniques are those who have previously had the most trouble falling asleep. So, in this answer, the two groups are being compared in a way that shows we might be mistaken about which technique is more effective. If we are to take the conclusion to be true, then it seems like we'd also want to assume that those who engage in behavior modification techniques are on a level playing field with those only taking sleeping pills. If (D) were true, then it would show that the two groups are not equal, which seems important in order to derive the conclusion.
My trouble comes from this: it does not destroy the argument. I know the Powerscore book says it doesn't need to, and I shouldn't be looking for that kind of answer, but it bothers me that (D) being true still does not *necessarily* mean that behavior modification techniques are more effective. How do I stop my brain from instantly distrusting answer choices that don't annihilate an argument?