- Mon Jan 07, 2019 5:54 pm
#61664
The claim at issue in the stimulus, Lsat180Please, is Cora's claim that using technology is natural, which was one of her premises. Cora isn't saying that Max is wrong about technology bringing about terrible changes. She's saying that he is wrong to think that technology is unnatural. Looked at another way, Max is saying "the solution is to be natural" and Cora is saying "but we are already being natural, so that's not the problem."
Don't focus on Cora's claim that Max's criticism is misguided - Cora's conclusion - because that is not the claim they asked us about. Focus on what they asked about, and prephrase what role it played in the argument overall.
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam