- Wed May 29, 2019 6:59 pm
#65192
While you are correct that answer D does not prove the conclusion, tizwvu34, because we don't know what else those arctic people are doing, it does help support the claim that "a high-calcium diet does not prevent osteoporosis." Since it supports that claim, which is one part of the nutritionist's view, it does strengthen the nutritionist's overall view.
Answer B, on the other hand, directly attacks the claim that a low-protein diet is essential. If you can reduce osteoporosis with just physical exercise or some other non-dietary therapy, then that special diet isn't essential, is it? That hurts the overall view of the nutritionist, rather than supporting it. Since answer B offers no support for the view, only a challenge to it, it is the exception and thus the correct answer.
Looks like you read a little too much into answer B, by the way. The answer does not say what those therapies are, and you should not assume that they are the kinds of therapies that the author mentioned. As written, with no outside help, answer B directly contradicts one part of the argument and does nothing to support any other portion.
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam