Khodi7531,
Thanks for the comments! I think there's a lot to unpack here
But hopefully I can help a bit. I'll try and respond to your questions in order.
1.) If the question asks "which of these words employed in paragraph 2..." you can be sure that all of these words did, in fact, appear in paragraph 2. So that's not going to be a way to eliminate answers, unfortunately.
2.) Yep - author's attitude means we have to know what the author thinks. Let's come back to unpopular vs. draconian - you've got it narrowed down well there.
3.) Not sure what has been said in the other forums, but this question is asking us about what the author thinks, not about what the citizens think. It is true that he/she thinks it would be unpopular, but that's a belief about how citizens will act, not an attitude towards the measure itself. In other words, it doesn't speak to whether or not the author likes the idea of restricting Internet access - it just speaks to how he/she thinks citizens would react. Draconian, which translates to overly harsh, is a better fit because it describes how the author feels about the measure - not how the citizens feel.
4.) All that being said, I think the point you make about having to write off some questions is valid. If you are in a situation where, for example, you don't know the definition of a word in a vocab question, it makes perfect sense to skip it and focus your energy on other questions, hoping to return to it if you have time. All questions are worth the exact same (1 point) and you should be spending your time getting as many right as possible.
Hope all of this helps!
AB