- Wed Jun 19, 2019 1:09 pm
#65714
I just have 2 general questions.
Firstly, I know that an appeal to improper authority is considered a flaw in reasoning, but is an appeal to a proper authority ever considered a flaw in reasoning?
Secondly, I'm normally good at Assumption questions. However, I have noticed that on recent LSATs, the Assumption questions seem to have gotten harder, but maybe it's just me. Even when you apply the Assumption Negation technique, it's not always easy to discern which answer is correct. Such questions are challenging under timed conditions, but later on when I review them untimed, I'm normally able to find the right answer. Do you have any advice on how to tackle Assumption questions on recent LSATs, especially under timed conditions?
Thank you very much for your time, I appreciate it.
Firstly, I know that an appeal to improper authority is considered a flaw in reasoning, but is an appeal to a proper authority ever considered a flaw in reasoning?
Secondly, I'm normally good at Assumption questions. However, I have noticed that on recent LSATs, the Assumption questions seem to have gotten harder, but maybe it's just me. Even when you apply the Assumption Negation technique, it's not always easy to discern which answer is correct. Such questions are challenging under timed conditions, but later on when I review them untimed, I'm normally able to find the right answer. Do you have any advice on how to tackle Assumption questions on recent LSATs, especially under timed conditions?
Thank you very much for your time, I appreciate it.