- Mon Aug 05, 2019 6:50 pm
#67074
I was told by Andrew via phone that the best place to ask advice is the forum.
Basically, I am very anxious at the moment and I am hoping one of you can give me some advice. I have taken the LSAT 6 times and scored a 159 - 158 - 162 - 158 - 159 - ??? (July 2019 pending). I applied to law school this year with the first three scores on record and received a good scholarship (2/3rds) to the University of Houston. I like the school well enough and it is in one of my target legal markets, but I really had my eyes set on UT Law...I am supposed to start at UH in several weeks, but I am trying to decide whether or not I should retake and reapply. I am afraid/very anxious of the worst possible outcomes of this strategy, however.
I see four possible outcomes if I decide to retake and reapply:
1. I do very well (165+)
2. I do middling well (162 again, 163, 164)
3. I do the same or slightly worse (160, 161, 162)
4. I perform as I have been performing (in the high 150s
I am deathly afraid of falling into categories three or four and how law schools will perceive 7, 8, or even 9 LSAT attempts on my record. Frankly, unless I fall into category 1 or maybe 2, I think I will look sad and a little desperate. I know that if I were an adcomm and saw that many takes with no improvement, I would consider the applicant less favorably. Also, UH would probably not even consider me next cycle if I were to withdraw.
I would have to change my test taking strategy again, which, you know, isn’t the end of the world...I’m just so nervous and anxious about taking this route.
I have been vacillating between going to UH and retaking/reapplying, and I would love your perspective. Thanks.
Edit: this is especially concerning when you factor in the new retake rules!
Basically, I am very anxious at the moment and I am hoping one of you can give me some advice. I have taken the LSAT 6 times and scored a 159 - 158 - 162 - 158 - 159 - ??? (July 2019 pending). I applied to law school this year with the first three scores on record and received a good scholarship (2/3rds) to the University of Houston. I like the school well enough and it is in one of my target legal markets, but I really had my eyes set on UT Law...I am supposed to start at UH in several weeks, but I am trying to decide whether or not I should retake and reapply. I am afraid/very anxious of the worst possible outcomes of this strategy, however.
I see four possible outcomes if I decide to retake and reapply:
1. I do very well (165+)
2. I do middling well (162 again, 163, 164)
3. I do the same or slightly worse (160, 161, 162)
4. I perform as I have been performing (in the high 150s
I am deathly afraid of falling into categories three or four and how law schools will perceive 7, 8, or even 9 LSAT attempts on my record. Frankly, unless I fall into category 1 or maybe 2, I think I will look sad and a little desperate. I know that if I were an adcomm and saw that many takes with no improvement, I would consider the applicant less favorably. Also, UH would probably not even consider me next cycle if I were to withdraw.
I would have to change my test taking strategy again, which, you know, isn’t the end of the world...I’m just so nervous and anxious about taking this route.
I have been vacillating between going to UH and retaking/reapplying, and I would love your perspective. Thanks.
Edit: this is especially concerning when you factor in the new retake rules!