- Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:41 pm
#62262
Hey Powerscore staff,
I have a question that maybe you can help me with. I have two academic letters of recommendation uploaded to my LSAC account from 2013, and 2 professional letters of recommendation uploaded as early as last week. I contacted the LSAC today due to a glitch in my account and the person on the phone started asking me if I had any newer letters of recommendation. I am not sure if my professors still work there or if they would be able to write a good letter at this point. I asked the LSAC staff member what value or difference a letter of recommendation written 6 years ago or this year would make regardless of when it was written, the letter pertains to my time in undergrad which has remained unchanged. Her only reasoning was that "usually schools like letters no later than 2-years old". If we are following principle for the sake of following principle, then that seems like a pretty garbage way to assess candidates. Is this the case? The pre-law advisor from my undergraduate university said that it would not matter since I had a recent professional letter of recommendation I could submit to compliment an academic one. Furthermore, my resume has some solid work experience if the question is "work-ethic"...
I have a question that maybe you can help me with. I have two academic letters of recommendation uploaded to my LSAC account from 2013, and 2 professional letters of recommendation uploaded as early as last week. I contacted the LSAC today due to a glitch in my account and the person on the phone started asking me if I had any newer letters of recommendation. I am not sure if my professors still work there or if they would be able to write a good letter at this point. I asked the LSAC staff member what value or difference a letter of recommendation written 6 years ago or this year would make regardless of when it was written, the letter pertains to my time in undergrad which has remained unchanged. Her only reasoning was that "usually schools like letters no later than 2-years old". If we are following principle for the sake of following principle, then that seems like a pretty garbage way to assess candidates. Is this the case? The pre-law advisor from my undergraduate university said that it would not matter since I had a recent professional letter of recommendation I could submit to compliment an academic one. Furthermore, my resume has some solid work experience if the question is "work-ethic"...