LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5972
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#73077
Setup and Rule Diagram Explanation

This is a Grouping: Defined-Fixed, Unbalanced, Underfunded game.

The game scenario indicates that a bakery delivers exactly six loaves of bread, each with two characteristics: kind of bread (O, R, W) and sliced/unsliced (S, U). Because the loaves are not ordered, this is a Grouping game. The basic scenario appears as follows:
D99_Game_#1_setup_diagram 1.png
Although the sliced/unsliced option could be shown as S and S, in this instance we have chosen S and U so as to avoid any possible confusion over a missed slash. If you represented it otherwise, there is no problem with that.

The first rule establishes that there are at least two kinds of loaves. Thus, all six loaves cannot be of a single kind:


..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Min 2 kinds


The second rule establishes that there are a maximum of three rye loaves:
D99_Game_#1_setup_diagram 2.png
The third rule states that no unsliced wheat loaf exists:
D99_Game_#1_setup_diagram 3.png
Correspondingly, because all loaves are sliced or unsliced, this means that every wheat loaf is sliced:
D99_Game_#1_setup_diagram 4.png
Because every wheat loaf is sliced, if a loaf is unsliced, it must be oatmeal or rye:
D99_Game_#1_setup_diagram 5.png
The fourth rule indicates that there is at least one unsliced oatmeal loaf:
D99_Game_#1_setup_diagram 6.png
Of course, from the first rule there must be at least two kinds of loaves, and since there is an oatmeal loaf, we can infer that at least one other loaf is rye or wheat, a fact that can be shown on our diagram with a dual-option:
D99_Game_#1_setup_diagram 7.png
The fifth rule is very specific, and states that if two or more loaves are unsliced, then at least one is rye:
D99_Game_#1_setup_diagram 8.png
The information from all of the rules can be combined to form the final diagram:
D99_Game_#1_setup_diagram 9.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 c-erv
  • Posts: 15
  • Joined: Oct 14, 2016
|
#29825
Hello all,

I am having trouble with this games set up, and looking for some guidence. All I've been able to infer is that there will be (at least) one unsliced oatmeal loaf and a slice of rye or wheat in order to meet the at least two kinds of loaves minimum. After that I am completely lost :-?
 Emily Haney-Caron
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 577
  • Joined: Jan 12, 2012
|
#29903
Hi c-erv,

You're right that, from the first rule, you can infer that there will be at least 1 of rye or wheat. Let's take a look at inferences for the other rules.

Rule 2: Since there are 6 loaves total, this rule tells us that there are at least 2 of either wheat or oatmeal (although there could be more of either); if we have 3 rye, we still need 3 more to get to 6, and with only 2 types left, we'd have either 2 of one of them and 1 of the other, or 3 oatmeal since we know we need at least 1 oatmeal (and if we have fewer than 3 rye loaves, we could have more of either wheat or oatmeal)

Rule 4: This means that, if there are 2 or more unsliced oatmeals loaves (since there can't be unsliced wheat), there will be 1 or more unsliced rye

With that, try the game again, and see where you get!
 LSAT2018
  • Posts: 242
  • Joined: Jan 10, 2018
|
#46709
With games that inform you of the minimum and the maximum such as this one, I think it would be difficult to list every possibility. So would an inference be better made using the minimum/maximums instead?

Also would this be similar to game 2 in Practice Test 32, which indicates minimum and the maximum as well?
 Vaidehi Joshi
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: Aug 16, 2018
|
#50055
@LSAT2018

I did not list out possibilities in this game. My approach to the main diagram for this game was to use a game board of the following type, since this is a bit of an unusual type of grouping game (pretty hard to draw using forum text, I hope you get the gist!)

S | U
--------------------------------------
o | |
--------------------------------------
R | |
--------------------------------------
W | |

And when I diagrammed the first two rules (which are min/max rules), I simply put:
R1: "min 2 KINDS" simply to remind myself that I can't just have all O's/all R's/all W's. it's hard to diagram this rule, so you gotta keep it in your head, I would say
R2: for this one, I just wrote to the side of my "R" row in the game board, "max 3" to keep in mind that I can only have 3 R's put into the diagram

Not really many other options to represent these right off the bat, until we get to later rules
 Jenmstearns
  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2019
|
#73042
I’m still stuck on the setup and inferences here. I couldn’t even figure out how to define the rules in a way that I could glean any information from it. What basic components am I overlooking when it comes to working with these minimums and maximums alongside two different variable sets (type of bread and sliced/unsliced)? It all just gets muddled in my head and I don’t know how to untangle my thought process.

Which components do I look at in which order to best make sense of the game? I did six spaced lines for type of bread with a corresponding set of lines above it for slice status, but after putting O with a U above it in one space, I had no notion of what questions to ask myself next to make any progress.
User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5972
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#73044
Hi Jen,

I'm going to have our official setup posted into this thread. I'm not sure why it isn't here yet. Should be Monday AM. Thanks!


Note: setup has been added

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.