Hi, jgabalski,
Excellent question and good job narrowing it down to these two "contenders." Let's start with the question task: We are instructed to find the
reason why the author introduces the relative egg-laying rate of the two kinds of mites. This "local purpose" type question often leads us to ask the question, "Why?"
Why does the author bring up the relative rate at which the two species of mites lay eggs? Often for these kinds of "why" questions the answer can be found directly above the citation. Why does this work? Because if a quotation serves a specific purpose, it usually (but not always) offers some kind of support for an immediately preceding contention.
For instance, here go back up to the beginning of this topic, around line 15. Beginning here we notice that the author is discussing Typhlodromus's effectiveness as a predator. As we read forward, note that one factor that contributes to this effectiveness is the fact that its "population can increase as rapidly as that of its prey." Now we have the necessary context. The discussion that follows through line 23 backs up this contention about relative rate of population increase.
Let's prephrase an answer for why the author brings up the egg-laying ability of each kind of mite:
The author brings up the egg-laying ability to show a way that the T mites can reproduce at a rate to match that of the C mites.
Now focus on the difference between answer choices (C) and (D). (C) focuses on the concept of "syncronicity" while (D) focuses on matching the rates. With this difference in mind, consider again the task of the question along with the prephrase. Why do we care about the egg-laying stuff? It has to do with the T mites effectiveness as C mite predators. "Syncronicity" might discuss
what happens, but it fails to address
why it happens.
I hope this helps!