- Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:30 pm
#73397
Hi Zach,
Understanding exactly what's being asked is the first key to this question. This is actually an inference question, as a "Most Strongly Supported": by asking what is "most consistent with" the idea of readjustment, we're being asked for what more specific policy or action would likely fall under that more general policy of readjustment.
The second key flows directly from this: we need to know what "readjustment" actually means. It's defined in the passage as "advocat[ing] the end of the federal government’s involvement in Native American affairs and encourag[ing] the assimilation of Native Americans as individuals into mainstream society." That's pretty vague, but it's the only textual support that we really have so it's what we'll go by in testing the answer choices. The correct answer choice will either lessen the federal government's involvement in Native American life, lead to Native American assimilation into larger American society, or both.
(A)--This is tempting at first, as it makes it sound like tribes would be more self-governing and thus less governed by the federal government. The problem is that the passage makes no mention of tribal government, as it's focused only economic aspects of readjustment. We don't even know that tribes didn't have elected governments at the time when readjustment policies were introduced.
(B)--Readjustment is about becoming more like mainstream Americans, so preserving native culture seems to run counter to that idea. Immediate loser.
(C)--This is tricky, and does require a bit of thought, but careful analysis can get us there. If Native Americans are moving away from reservations and into "urban areas," they are almost certainly integrating more into mainstream American society; urban areas in America are predominantly non-Native American, and have individual property ownership as described in the latter paragraphs of the passage. So this is actually supported by the passage's definition of readjustment, and the correct answer choice.
(D)--Similar to (B), this is an Opposite Answer that goes directly against readjustment's goals. Loser.
(E)--We don't know what the Federal treaty obligations are, so this answer is unknowable. More likely an Opposite Answer than the correct answer, another Loser.
Hope this clears things up!