LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 brown117
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: Feb 05, 2013
|
#7585
I was working on a drill for review and reviewing the answers in the book. I understood and got the first part right but I did not understand why the correct answers were correct for part two of the question. Was it because part two continued to operate off the premise that B does not occur as it did in the first part of the problem? Can someone help me?

A :arrow: B :arrow: C

If B does not occur, what:
Must be true: A does not occur
Could be true: C occurs: C does not occur
Cannot be true: A occurs

If C occurs, what:

Must be true: B does not occur; A does not occur
Could be true:
Cannot be true; B occurs; A occurs
 Luke Haqq
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 927
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2012
|
#7591
Hi! Hopefully I'll be able to help. First off, it looks as though you have question one reproduced without C being negated (I'll represent negation with "~"). It should read:

A :arrow: B :arrow: ~C

Your question is particularly about the second part.

If C occurs, what must be true, could be true, and cannot be true?

To answer these questions, try taking the contrapositive of the first statement:

C :arrow: ~B :arrow: ~A

This has to be true, given the first statement. If you have C, you can have neither B nor A. Once we have this contrapositive, we can return to the three questions. What

Must be true? B and A do not occur
Could be true? --
Cannot be true? B and A occur; C does not occur.
 brown117
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: Feb 05, 2013
|
#7596
Thank you so much. After reading your comment I had to go back and look at my book again. I have done the problems so many times and left so many marks I could not tell what the original problems stated. Thank you again :-D

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.