- Fri Jun 05, 2020 4:54 pm
#75991
You are exactly on track there, iLSAT180! The issue raised in answer A is one of bias - if the investment guys have certain biases, that might make their assessments less reliable than the author would have us believe.
Here's the argument:
Premise: Investment Co. economists are risking their jobs, academics are not
Sub-Conclusion: We should take the Investment Co. economists more seriously than the academics
Premise: Investment Co. economists think the recovery will be strong, while academic economists do not
Conclusion: The recovery will be strong
To weaken this argument, we want to see some evidence that perhaps the Investment Co. economists might be wrong, despite the risk they are taking in making their predictions. Perhaps they have a strong motive to take that risk, one which might cast doubt on their reliability?
Well done, keep that up and don't doubt yourself!
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam