- Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:26 am
#67993
Hi jmann,
Both Regina and Amal are focused on the future effects of the new revenue the government is getting by leasing toll bridges to private investors. They reach differing conclusions about whether one of those effects will be to free up money to assist with budgetary shortfalls in non-transportation areas of the budget. But notice, each one sticks strictly to answering this factual, and future-oriented, question: "What effect will the new money have on non-transportation areas of the budget?" Neither speaker makes a judgment about what is true of the budget at present, and neither speaker expresses an opinion on whether the current situation is good enough or not good enough. Answer choice B is rooted in the present (not the future), and it expresses an opinion about whether the present situation is good enough: "the amount of money currently allocated to transportation is adequate." Since we don't know the speakers' opinions about the present state of the transportation budget (because the speakers are focused solely on future effects), we don't know whether they disagree about answer choice B.
Answer choice D is a better choice, because it addresses specifically that question that I identified above ("What effect will the new money have on non-transportation areas of the budget?"). We know the speakers' views of answer choice D: Amal will agree with answer choice D, he specifically states the new money will help reduce budget shortfalls in other areas (because existing funds will be reallocated). Regina will disagree with answer choice D, because she says the leases will not be used to reduce shortfalls in other areas.
I hope this helps!
Jeremy
Jeremy Press
LSAT Instructor and law school admissions consultant
Follow me on Twitter at:
https://twitter.com/JeremyLSAT