LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

General questions relating to the LSAT or LSAT preparation.
 PatMcGroin
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: Nov 02, 2020
|
#80645
Wondering if I can get some clarification on these, or if any of the diagrams are wrong?

A requires B = A --> B
A is required for/by B = A --> B
A is necessary for B = A --> B
A necessitates B = A --> B
A needs B = A --> B
All that is required for A is B = A --> B

Thanks a lot!
User avatar
 KelseyWoods
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1079
  • Joined: Jun 26, 2013
|
#80716
Hi Pat!

A requires B = A needs B = A necessitates B = All that is required for A is B = A :arrow: B
These statements are all saying the same thing--that A needs B. In other words, B is necessary for A. Thus, B is the necessary condition and goes on the necessary side of our diagram (at the end of the arrow).


A is necessary for B = A is required for/by B = B :arrow: A
These statements are saying that A is the necessary condition. A is necessary/required for B. Thus, A goes on the necessary side of our diagram (at the end of the arrow).

When you are reading phrases like this, really think about which condition is necessary for the other one. Whichever is the necessary condition always goes at the end of the arrow.

Hope this helps!

Best,
Kelsey
 PatMcGroin
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: Nov 02, 2020
|
#80773
Hi Kelsey,

Thanks for your response. One more question:

in case of where a conditional statement has "No one", "None", or "Nothing", does that imply a double-not arrow? For example, No A is B would mean A :dblline: B ?

Also would "cannot" imply the same thing? Ex. A cannot be B = B cannot be A?

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.