- Wed Dec 02, 2020 12:57 pm
#81644
I'd say there is support in the passage for the idea that the President had usurped some authority, if we define "usurp" as "encroach or infringe upon," rather than the stronger definitions of the word that indicate the infringement is illegal, and perhaps even if we do view it that way.
In the first paragraph the author tells us that "Congress has at last reclaimed a role in such decisions." The use of "reclaimed" supports that idea that their proper role had been taken from them by the President.
In the second paragraph, the author speaks of "Congress's tolerance of presidential discretion," which suggests to me that they were putting up with something that they did not have to accept. That also, to me, lends some support to the idea that the President was encroaching on their authority, but that they were choosing to let it slide.
Finally, in the third paragraph, the author says that the War Powers Resolution was "in accord with the intent and spirit of the Constitution" in that it required congressional involvement. This, too, supports the idea that Presidents had, until then, been acting unilaterally in decisions that should have involved Congress.
I think it's a cumulative concept that permeates the whole passage, Mattjsd, and while the answer does sound a bit strong, it's not too strong when you look at the sum of all the parts. And of course, it's better than all the other answers, even if it is less than perfect, and the best answer is always the credited answer!
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam