Hi,
I have trouble eliminating A - The distinction that Robin makes between two kinds of cultures is illicit.
I chose B under timed section, giving the fact that Robin's statement made a binary cut of living styles to either nomadic or sedentary. Robin's conditional statement shows:
artifacts made to last
likely sedentary
and I can imply from the statement:
artifacts made to be quickly discarded
likely nomadic
Hence, Robin agrees with answer choice B that "it is reasonable to assume that a culture whose artifacts were not durable was nomadic".
Kendall questions Robin's method to determine ancient cultures by considering the availability of materials to made artifacts. From Kendall's statement, it is reasonable to conclude that Kendall does not agree with Robin's method of determining a culture's living style. So Kendall does not agree that "it is reasonable to assume ... "
However, I hesitate when I was reviewing answer choice A. I may have trouble processing what A is talking about. I was confused if it is safe enough to infer that the distinction Robin makes counted as distinction between two cultures? or strictly speaking, it should be the live style of two cultures? Since I am not a native speaker, I can't tell whether there are any differences.
If it is not the problem of A, is it because Robin does not comment on his/her own argument? From my understanding, Kendall does agree that "the distinction that Robin makes between two kinds of cultures is illicit".
Thank you!