LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8950
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#27395
Complete Question Explanation

Resolve the ParadoxX. The correct answer choice is (B)

This stimulus describes the study of a particular community’s elderly. For some reason, those elderly who moved to the community in the last five years are healthier than those elderly who spent their lives in the community. A resolution would help to explain why the health of one group is better than that of the other. Because this is a ResolveX question, the four incorrect answer choices will provide some resolution, and the correct answer choice will not.

Answer choice (A): This answer choice would provide some explanation for the disparity in general health between the two groups. The group of movers was a self-selecting sample—they all chose to move. If those with the means to relocate tend to be in better health, this would explain why we would expect the group who had moved to be healthier as a group than those who had lived in the community for their whole lives (based on the information presented in the stimulus, there is no way to assess whether or not any of the life-long residents have the means to relocate).

Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice to this ResolveX question, because it is the one which fails to provide an explanation for the difference in health between the two groups. The stimulus deals only with two groups of elderly, so the proportions of young versus elderly do not come into play.

Answer choice (C): Like incorrect answer choice (A) above, this choice would also help to explain why the elderly who had lived in the community for longer might be expected to be in worse physical health (having dealt with low-quality health care for their entire lives), than those who have lived in the community for five years or less, having had access to potentially better quality health care.

Answer choice (D): If changing one’s environment tends to be beneficial, then this would help to explain why the elderly who had had such a change in the last five years might have reason to expect better health in general than those had live in the community for their entire lives.

Answer choice (E): This choice would help to explain why those recent movers are in better health as a group, in much the same way as answer choice (A) above. This was a self-selecting sample—that is, this group is comprised of people who were able to move. The same cannot be said for the elderly who lived in the community for their entire lives. Since this provides some resolution to the paradox, it is one of four incorrect answer choices to this ResolveX question.
User avatar
 Aliya316
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: Dec 22, 2020
|
#82839
I am a little bit confused about the correct answer B. If most people moved into this town are young, there’s possibility that few or no elderly people moved into this town last five years, also most people lived in this town are old people, so that means most old people in this town are either born in this town or came to this town earlier than five years ago. It is possible B is an explanation if I compare the number of different elders.

I personally chose answer C, because the quality of healthcare in this community have to Equally effect both kinds of elderly people in this town. In my opinion, the number difference of two kinds of elderly people matters more than the reason can affect their health in this case.

Please help with this problem, thank you so much and happy new year!
User avatar
 KelseyWoods
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1079
  • Joined: Jun 26, 2013
|
#82849
Hi Aliya! Welcome to the Forum!

The numbers of elderly people doesn't matter here. We know that elderly people have moved into the community because the stimulus tells us so. We also know that the elderly people who have lived there all their lives are in worse health than the elderly people who have moved in within the last 5 years. These are facts that we have to accept as true. The exact numbers in each group are irrelevant. For example, let's pretend that only 10 elderly people have moved into the community, but 100 elderly people have lived there all their lives. Does that explain why those 10 new residents are in better health than the 100 native residents? Nope! We still need to know why those 10 elderly people are in better health than the other 100 elderly people.

Answer choice (C), on the other hand, does explain the difference in health of our two groups of elderly people. Sure, they all have the same crappy healthcare now. But the people who have lived there all their lives grew up with that crappy healthcare. They've never had access to good care at any point in their lives. So maybe they haven't had appropriate diagnoses and maintenance of chronic conditions. Or maybe acute conditions resulted in long term effects because they didn't have access to the right treatment. Maybe they couldn't get vaccines. Maybe they didn't have a physician encouraging them to eat well and get exercise. The healthcare you receive when you are young can have long term effects so if the people who have lived there all their lives have had poor healthcare all their lives, they are already starting off well behind the curve when it comes to their health status. The people that moved in from somewhere else in the country, however, grew up with better healthcare. So maybe if they get sick now, they'll be dealing with the same problems with the healthcare system as everyone else in the community is. But they already started off in a better position health-wise because they've had better care throughout most of their lives.

Hope this helps! Happy New Year to you as well!

Best,
Kelsey

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.