- Sat Dec 26, 2020 7:26 pm
#82765
You should always try to build some diagram, menkenj, even if you aren't entirely clear on what makes the best base. Internalizing the rules with no diagram and diving in will usually result in a lot of wasted time as you keep mulling them over, drawing out new diagrams, etc.
This is an unusual game in that it seems like either variable set could make a good base. Robert's setup has the students as the base, an you could use that to set up some templates based on who presents on Shakespeare's villains (either R does and W does not, or W does and R does not, or neither of them does and G must). You could do the same with the presentations as the base, and I would again look at doing those same templates (I am a template junkie!) But to go forward with nothing but the rules, and no base into which to place them, will, for most students, mean a lot more time ultimately spent on the questions than if you had some sort of starting point.
When you aren't sure what to use for the base, think about the numbers. Here, every student has to do one or more presentations, so students could be a good base. Every presentation has to be done by at least one students, so that gives you essentially the same numeric information and indicates that presentations could be a good base, too. At that point, pick one and run with it! Almost without exception you will be better off than with no base at all.
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam