LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Adam Tyson
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5387
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2011
|
#84397
Your analysis of D is good, Albert! "Not precisely determined" is too weak and vague for it to do any damage, and so it does not, by itself, hurt the argument. The author could still respond with "fine, we need to figure that bit out, but we should still do this because it works." And changing answer D the way you suggested would make it a good weaken answer, because it would be a strong counter to the claim that we should expand the program.
User avatar
 Albertlyu
  • Posts: 98
  • Joined: Jul 18, 2020
|
#84412
Adam Tyson wrote: Tue Feb 23, 2021 2:08 pm Your analysis of D is good, Albert! "Not precisely determined" is too weak and vague for it to do any damage, and so it does not, by itself, hurt the argument. The author could still respond with "fine, we need to figure that bit out, but we should still do this because it works." And changing answer D the way you suggested would make it a good weaken answer, because it would be a strong counter to the claim that we should expand the program.
thank you, Adam. Have a good day! :-D

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.