- Mon May 03, 2021 11:47 am
#86789
Hi funky_fancy_name,
I think you've done a good job of identifying the reasons why answers A, B, C, and E are incorrect. But I think you're focusing too much on Eltis's argument in answering this question. After all, according to the author, Eltis differs from Williams (even though Eltis's account is better than Drescher's, and partially confirms Williams's viewpoint). For example, the author says, "Eltis thus concludes that, while Williams may well have underestimated the economic viability of the British colonies employing forced labor in the early 1800s, his insight into the economic motives for
abolition was partly accurate." And later, "for reasons other than those cited by Williams, ... free labor was more beneficial to the imperial economy."
Since this question asks specifically about Williams's view, we're better off returning to the first paragraph for support for answer choice D, especially the last sentence of that paragraph: "Blighted by depleted soil, indebtedness, and the inefficiency of coerced labor, these colonies, to Williams, had by 1807 become an impediment to British economic progress." That sentence really highlights Williams's view that the operation of colonies (with their depleted soil, debt, and inefficiency) were simply not helping British economic progress (i.e. were "no longer economically advantageous").
I hope this helps!
Jeremy Press
LSAT Instructor and law school admissions consultant
Follow me on Twitter at:
https://twitter.com/JeremyLSAT