LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8950
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#78743
Passage Discussion

VIEWSTAMP Analysis:


This explanation is still in progress. Please post any questions below!
 blade21cn
  • Posts: 100
  • Joined: May 21, 2019
|
#86705
I've difficulty comprehending the sentence starting on line 29 - "their distrust was largely a reaction against the prevailing attitude in the 1830s that the railroad was an unqualified improvement." What does "that the railroad was an unqualified improvement" refer to, "distrust," "reaction," or "prevailing attitude"? It sounds to me "that the railroad was an unqualified improvement" is a distrust itself, but it's difficult for me to analyze the structure of this sentence grammatically. Thanks!
 blade21cn
  • Posts: 100
  • Joined: May 21, 2019
|
#86730
Upon further review, I'm gonna answer my own question. Guess I was confused by the word "unqualified." I previously only thought of the word's general meaning as "not qualified." But "unqualified" actually has a second, if not an opposite, meaning: without qualification/reservation, total. So the clause "that the railroad was an unqualified improvement" is indeed modifying the closest noun just preceding it, i.e., "prevailing attitude," and that prevailing attitude is a positive one.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.