- Tue Dec 22, 2020 11:03 am
#82668
This is a form of Must Be True question, and the use of "proposition" in the stem means that we are looking for what we usually call a principle in the answer choice. You can also think of it as a rule, a guideline, or just "words of wisdom." What we are looking for is a general rule that the information in the stimulus followed or demonstrated.
One approach to a question like this is to treat it like a Method of Reasoning question and strip away the details in the stimulus to find the underlying abstraction. There's no argument, but there is still an abstract structure under those facts, and it is something like "prioritizing an important new thing can have a negative impact on some important old things." And the use of "can" here instead of something stronger like "must" is important, because all we know is that it happens in this particular situation, and there isn't enough evidence to say that something similar will happen in every similar situation. Keep the prephrase, and your answer choice, "soft" and easy to prove based on the facts.
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam