- Mon Jul 16, 2018 10:08 pm
#47986
I'd say that is the first, best, and easiest way to eliminate that answer, ct325, since author A says nothing about prevarication (lying or deliberately avoiding the truth). We need something that BOTH authors show a concern with, and the evidence that they are concerned with it must come directly from the passages and not from any assumptions we might make about what they think of the issue.
A secondary reason for eliminating it is that even author B isn't primarily concerned with lying, but is only using that concept as a springboard to talk about the bigger issue, which is conscious intention.
A secondary reason for eliminating it is that even author B isn't primarily concerned with lying, but is only using that concept as a springboard to talk about the bigger issue, which is conscious intention.
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/LSATadam
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/LSATadam