- Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:45 am
#80374
Hi trashpanda,
I think you're right to suggest that the focus on "science and society" in answer choice A doesn't fit very well with the passage's description of the consequences of a dramatic decrease in biodiversity. It's only paragraph 1 that really discusses this with any specificity, and the author doesn't get very specific about the expected consequences ("The ultimate consequences of this biological collision are beyond calculation, but they are certain to be harmful."). Notice how that statement doesn't specifically target science and society.
There's another reason answer choice A isn't ideal, and that is the use of the term "irreversible." We do know that any species that is lost cannot be replaced ("every species is unique and irreplaceable"), but the author doesn't indicate whether loss of biodiversity is truly "irreversible." Indeed, there are hints in the passage that at certain points in the Earth's history, biodiversity made a comeback from an earlier era of loss ("It took 5 million years, well into Mesozoic times, for species diversity to begin a significant recovery.") Long story short, we cannot be sure whether the author thinks the loss of biodiversity is truly "irreversible." We just know the author has significant concerns about its consequences.
I hope this helps!
Jeremy Press
LSAT Instructor and law school admissions consultant
Follow me on Twitter at:
https://twitter.com/JeremyLSAT