The first thing I would suggest, FMorell, is that you look over our discussion of the setup of this game here:
viewtopic.php?f=1280&t=26612
There, you should discover that one option is a 2-2-2 distribution in which the PS block goes to either G or to H.
Looking over your analysis, I see that you've made a false inference in your setup when you said this:
"P and S must be edited together, so that forces it away from H because it would give H 3 text books."
Run through that again, because H would not have to get 3 books, but could (and in fact, MUST) get exactly 2 books, P and S. Here's the step by step on that:
1. G gets Z, which means two things: F gets L, because F always gets at least one of those two, and G cannot get M, because whenever G gets M, G gets nothing else. This also means that F gets M. Up to this point, you're good.
2. The PS block cannot now go to F, because F already has L and M and cannot get 4 books. The only possible distributions in this game are 3-1-2 and 2-2-2! So the PS block MUST go to H, and H is done.
3. That leaves R not assigned yet, and it can go to either F (for a 3-1-2 distribution) or to G (a 2-2-2 distribution).
Therein lies the answer! R can go to F or else to G, but none of those other answer choices can happen.
Give some thought to why you determined that H would end up getting 3 books. Did you perhaps think that H had to edit R? Since R is a random variable in this game, anyone can edit it. Maybe you carried that inference over from question 15, which was a local question in which H did edit R? The restrictions in local questions apply only to those questions, and they should not be carried forward into other questions!
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam