- Wed Oct 06, 2021 4:23 pm
#91081
Hello all,
Yes, for this question, it's essential to look at the perspective taken by each author in evaluating the merit or benefit of government subsidies for the arts. While Alice (in the comment above) correctly identifies that passage A certainly identifies Social Capital as one of the central benefits provided by the arts, we really don't see such a benefit even acknowledged in passage B. And I think that this is primarily because the author of passage B views art's value in terms of the enjoyment it provides at the individual level. In fact, the author of Passage B goes out of their way to distinguish the aesthetic enjoyment of art from what is necessarily a public good, mainly national defense. For the author here, any art so subsidized must provide some type of aesthetic enjoyment to each person individually. There is no acknowledgment that art has can have a "public" or "social" benefit that can be enjoyed at the collective level (at least in terms of the line of argument so taken), such as that mentioned in Passage A's discussion of Social Capital. For that reason, A is the best answer, given the perspectives and arguments made by each author.
Now, as you all probably know, one way to always tackle any question on the LSAT is to eliminate answer choices, and here, I think we can successfully eliminate all the other answer choices, especially with respect to private art support and art institutions, both of which the author of passage B does not explicitly mention, and I think that answer choice B would misrepresent the argument of the author of passage B. No claim is made or implied about there not being any benefit, rather that there is no single benefit to all.
As this is a new test, I'm sure that there will be potentially many follow up questions to this; although I do hope this clears things up preliminarily. As to further questions, ask away!