- Sun Aug 22, 2021 9:51 pm
#89923
Hello,
1. In the explanation and analysis of the example paragraph 1, Lines 11-15, it is said that the viewpoint of the “file sharers” is somewhat contrary to the previous viewpoint I.e., the viewpoint of the Intellectual Property owners; I’m having difficulty understanding how the viewpoint of the file sharers is somewhat contrary to that of the intellectual property owners.
I also ended up categorizing the viewpoint of intellectual property owners as “Musicians”, because of “such as music” I saw in the paragraph, would that be okay or did I make a mistake, please do let me know how and how can I avoid making it again.
2. How would one go about differentiating the viewpoints of the Commentator and the Author I seem to be getting them confused, could you also please let me know things to look for.
For context, this is regarding the example paragraph 2 about the work of Toni Morrison.
Thank you so much!
1. In the explanation and analysis of the example paragraph 1, Lines 11-15, it is said that the viewpoint of the “file sharers” is somewhat contrary to the previous viewpoint I.e., the viewpoint of the Intellectual Property owners; I’m having difficulty understanding how the viewpoint of the file sharers is somewhat contrary to that of the intellectual property owners.
I also ended up categorizing the viewpoint of intellectual property owners as “Musicians”, because of “such as music” I saw in the paragraph, would that be okay or did I make a mistake, please do let me know how and how can I avoid making it again.
2. How would one go about differentiating the viewpoints of the Commentator and the Author I seem to be getting them confused, could you also please let me know things to look for.
For context, this is regarding the example paragraph 2 about the work of Toni Morrison.
Thank you so much!