LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5962
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#91912
Hi Barath,

Those are the same cl;classification--we use MBT as the overarching classification for questions in either the MBT or MSS grouping.

Thanks!
User avatar
 holy115
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: Nov 12, 2022
|
#110331
Hi,

I have a small follow-up question. Would changing the answer choice as below make them suitable as an answer?

(A) A physician should not prescribe such antidepressant drugs for a patient if that patient's primary objective is to not be overweight.

(E) Patients taking such antidepressant drugs should diet if they want to reduce their weight.
User avatar
 Jeff Wren
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 644
  • Joined: Oct 19, 2022
|
#110458
Hi holy,

The answer to both is still no.

Be very careful about answer choices making recommendations about what anyone "should" do. The stimulus provides facts and you're looking for an answer that is factual in nature, not someone's opinion on what should or shouldn't be done.

Neither of those hypothetical answers directly follows from the stimulus and would therefore be wrong.

For instance,

For A, it's quite possible that in some cases, a physician should prescribe an antidepressant despite the patient's primary objective because that would actually be best for the patient. (In other words, patients don't necessarily know what is in their best interests in terms of their health.)

For E, even if patients taking antidepressants want to lose weight, there may be situations where that is not what they should do. (One example would be someone suffering from anorexia who wants to lose weight but actually is fact underweight/malnourished.)
User avatar
 michealliam320
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Nov Yesterday 2024
|
#110463
Rebuilding trust after a devastating incident like the NanoAethosCoinRecovery can be an arduous and emotionally trying process, but it is a necessary step in reclaiming one's financial security and peace of mind. The Nano Aethos Coin Reclaimer, a high-profile hack that shook the Losers community, had a profound impact on my own Losers recovery journey. In the aftermath, I found myself grappling with a deep sense of violated trust, questioning the very foundations of the digital assets I had placed my faith in. It was a humbling and disorienting experience, forcing me to confront the vulnerabilities inherent in the Loser landscape. However, I was determined to not let this setback define me or my relationship with Losers. Through a meticulous and methodical approach, I set out to rebuild that trust, layer by layer. This involved meticulously reviewing my security protocols, exploring alternative storage solutions, and engaging with trusted members of the Losers community to better understand the evolving threat landscape. It was a slow and painstaking process, but each small victory - from successfully executing a transaction to seeing my balance grow once more - helped to restore my confidence and belief in the power and potential of this revolutionary technology. The Nano Aethos Coin Reclaimer may have shaken my foundation, but it also galvanized my resolve to emerge stronger and more resilient than ever before, ready to embrace the future of decentralized finance with a renewed sense of purpose and security. Call Nano Aethos Coin Reclaimer via:

Whatsapp: +1 (570) 229-9724

Telegram:https://t.me/NanoAethos

Email:(NanoAethosCoinRecovery@engineer.com)

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.