- Fri Nov 12, 2021 3:22 pm
#92052
Hi,
In trying to figure out how to avoid making the mistake I made on this question (choosing E instead of C) again, I'm running into a lack of understanding regarding how to parse the wording correctly in each answer choice.
I initially skipped over C fairly quickly, since the wording to me implies that (if they exist) the ants foraging for food in the Sahara at noon don't generally use pheromones as a means of navigation: "...generally do not use pheromones to guide themselves between food and their nest." I thought a statement like this was unfounded; just because the pheromones might evaporate doesn't mean ants living in the Sahara wouldn't persist in using them for navigation, generally. Perhaps the ants die out within a week due to a singular reliance on pheromone navigation; perhaps they're terrible at foraging in the Sahara for that reason. Either way, I don't see how the language of answer C implies that hypothetical ants foraging are necessarily successful in their foraging, and thus would require some other kind of navigational tool to be successful.
In turn, I chose E, although I recognized there isn't a whole lot of reason to argue that ants foraging in the Sahara without pheromones couldn't accidentally become more efficient in navigating (e.g. bumping into rocks gets them home sooner than pheromones would have, coincidentally). Nevertheless, E didn't seem to inappropriately deny ants in the Sahara the faulty use of pheromones like C did to me.
So, what about the wording of answer C allows us to assume that the hypothetical Saharan ants would be successful in foraging, and would thus need to rely on something other than pheromones to navigate?
In trying to figure out how to avoid making the mistake I made on this question (choosing E instead of C) again, I'm running into a lack of understanding regarding how to parse the wording correctly in each answer choice.
I initially skipped over C fairly quickly, since the wording to me implies that (if they exist) the ants foraging for food in the Sahara at noon don't generally use pheromones as a means of navigation: "...generally do not use pheromones to guide themselves between food and their nest." I thought a statement like this was unfounded; just because the pheromones might evaporate doesn't mean ants living in the Sahara wouldn't persist in using them for navigation, generally. Perhaps the ants die out within a week due to a singular reliance on pheromone navigation; perhaps they're terrible at foraging in the Sahara for that reason. Either way, I don't see how the language of answer C implies that hypothetical ants foraging are necessarily successful in their foraging, and thus would require some other kind of navigational tool to be successful.
In turn, I chose E, although I recognized there isn't a whole lot of reason to argue that ants foraging in the Sahara without pheromones couldn't accidentally become more efficient in navigating (e.g. bumping into rocks gets them home sooner than pheromones would have, coincidentally). Nevertheless, E didn't seem to inappropriately deny ants in the Sahara the faulty use of pheromones like C did to me.
So, what about the wording of answer C allows us to assume that the hypothetical Saharan ants would be successful in foraging, and would thus need to rely on something other than pheromones to navigate?