- PowerScore Staff
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Mar 29, 2023
- Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:04 pm
#100732
Complete Question Explanation
Main Point. The correct answer choice is (D).
The newspaper columnist is laying out that what caused the current recession is hotly debated and then claims that it is wrong to assume that answering the question of what caused it would be essential to improving the economy. To support his claim he makes an analogy to corrective lenses being used before discovering what caused myopia.
This is a main point question that asks us to identify the conclusion of the argument.
The first sentence regarding what caused the recession is not the main point because the author goes on to discuss why answering that question is irrelevant to answering it. Since this sentence isn't supported by premises, it isn't the main point.
The second sentence about it being a mistake to assume we need the answer to the question is supported by the analogy of corrective lenses and as such is what the author is trying to argue.
The last sentence containing the analogy is a premise that is being used to support the second sentence.
Our prephrase is that the main point is that there is no need to figure out the cause of the recession in order to answer it.
Answer choice (A): The claim that solving a problem never requires finding the root cause was never made by the author and as such isn't the main point.
Answer choice (B): Author isn't arguing that knowing the cause wouldn't help. He is saying that there is no need to ascertain the cause in order to find a solution.
Answer choice (C): That is an unsupported assertion and as such can't be the main point.
Answer choice (D): This is the correct answer choice. because this sentence is supported by the analogy given and as such is the conclusion
Answer choice (E): The myopia is referenced as an analogy to support the main point and as such isn't the main point.
Main Point. The correct answer choice is (D).
The newspaper columnist is laying out that what caused the current recession is hotly debated and then claims that it is wrong to assume that answering the question of what caused it would be essential to improving the economy. To support his claim he makes an analogy to corrective lenses being used before discovering what caused myopia.
This is a main point question that asks us to identify the conclusion of the argument.
The first sentence regarding what caused the recession is not the main point because the author goes on to discuss why answering that question is irrelevant to answering it. Since this sentence isn't supported by premises, it isn't the main point.
The second sentence about it being a mistake to assume we need the answer to the question is supported by the analogy of corrective lenses and as such is what the author is trying to argue.
The last sentence containing the analogy is a premise that is being used to support the second sentence.
Our prephrase is that the main point is that there is no need to figure out the cause of the recession in order to answer it.
Answer choice (A): The claim that solving a problem never requires finding the root cause was never made by the author and as such isn't the main point.
Answer choice (B): Author isn't arguing that knowing the cause wouldn't help. He is saying that there is no need to ascertain the cause in order to find a solution.
Answer choice (C): That is an unsupported assertion and as such can't be the main point.
Answer choice (D): This is the correct answer choice. because this sentence is supported by the analogy given and as such is the conclusion
Answer choice (E): The myopia is referenced as an analogy to support the main point and as such isn't the main point.