- Thu Jan 06, 2022 3:29 pm
#93121
Hi, could this one be explained?
I understand why B is an appropriate principle which relates to the passage's discussion in paragraph 4. However, what makes A incorrect?
The author states the problem with the internal relations theory is that it makes knowledge acquisition impossible. The author continues in the second sentence of paragraph four: "To truly know an entity, we must know all of its relationships..." I took this combination of statements (and paragraph four as a whole) as evidence of an assumption being made by the author that knowledge acquisition = truly knowing an entity (which is a part of a complex system). Since the internal relations theory dictates that we must comprehend all of the systems of which the entity is a part before knowing the entity, the author concludes the theory makes it impossible to know an entity. It seems that the theory's failure to allow for entity-definition is the author's "ultimate difficulty" with it.
I completely understand how answer B captures this concept, but it seems like the application of Answer A's principle would lead the author to the same conclusion. If a theory must define all the entities within a complex system, and the internal relations theory makes doing so impossible, then the theory must fail to be adequate/acceptable.
Am I reading A incorrectly, or the passage itself? Thanks for any insight.