- Wed Jan 12, 2022 12:43 pm
#93272
GGIBA003,
It's very difficult to tell how often this comes up. There are 471 Weaken questions, representing 2,355 Weaken answer choices. Of those, a certain number are wrong answers that actually strengthen the argument by making the conclusion more likely while at the same time undermining a premise. There is no straightforward way to classify those without a time-intensive brute-force search. I think it makes the most sense to be aware of this general concept in the future, as specific examples aren't really necessarily to understand the point that a wrong answer to a Weaken question that undermines a premise may do so in such a way that is strengthens the conclusion. As part of your evaluation of answer choices for Weaken questions anyway, you're always going to be looking at the impact of the answer on the conclusion. If that impact seems positive, the answer is wrong. Whether, in addition, it weakens a premise doesn't seem like useful extra info - if it is good for the conclusion, it doesn't weaken, and that's enough to reject the answer.
Robert Carroll
It's very difficult to tell how often this comes up. There are 471 Weaken questions, representing 2,355 Weaken answer choices. Of those, a certain number are wrong answers that actually strengthen the argument by making the conclusion more likely while at the same time undermining a premise. There is no straightforward way to classify those without a time-intensive brute-force search. I think it makes the most sense to be aware of this general concept in the future, as specific examples aren't really necessarily to understand the point that a wrong answer to a Weaken question that undermines a premise may do so in such a way that is strengthens the conclusion. As part of your evaluation of answer choices for Weaken questions anyway, you're always going to be looking at the impact of the answer on the conclusion. If that impact seems positive, the answer is wrong. Whether, in addition, it weakens a premise doesn't seem like useful extra info - if it is good for the conclusion, it doesn't weaken, and that's enough to reject the answer.
Robert Carroll