LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

General questions relating to the LSAT Logic Games.
 zwiedman
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: Apr 13, 2013
|
#9333
I've encountered a few different words (indicators) in conditional reasoning and was wondering if somebody could clarify them for me and if I'm diagramming them correctly.

A depends on B
A--->B

A implies B
B----->A


A assures B
B----->A

are these correct?
 Nikki Siclunov
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1362
  • Joined: Aug 02, 2011
|
#9334
Hi,

Thanks for your question.
A depends on B
A--->B
This is correct. If B is depended upon, it is a necessary condition for A.
A implies B
B----->A
If A implies B, that does not mean that A is a necessary condition for B. If anything, it could be the other way around. I'd hesitate to even draw a conditional diagram here, because mere implication falls short of the absolute relationship between sufficient/necessary condition we expect to find in any conditional statement.
A assures B
B----->A
If the occurrence of A assures the occurrence of B, then A is sufficient, and B is necessary. You have the diagram backwards. It should be A :arrow: B. That said, the word "assures" is not something commonly used by the test makers to create conditional reasoning statements. It would be a rare occasion for them to use this phrasing.

Hope this helps! Let me know.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.