- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sep 21, 2021
- Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:23 pm
#94010
VIEWSTAMP Analysis
Structure
1: well-trained artists can forge unrecognizable art that passes as real
2: questions about forgers & their abilities to fool critics are proposed
3: forging lacks intangibles & are of lesser artistic (but not always aesthetic) quality
4: historical significance (intangible technique) relies on (1) time period and (2) before most everyone else
MP: identification and discussion of why a forged artwork can be of similar aesthetic, but is always of lesser artistic quality, than an original, alluding to those "intangibles" which make original pieces of work, original
Viewpoints: author, and Lessing
Tone: informative, mildly argumentative
Argument: forged works lack intangibles that original works always possess
Structure
1: well-trained artists can forge unrecognizable art that passes as real
2: questions about forgers & their abilities to fool critics are proposed
3: forging lacks intangibles & are of lesser artistic (but not always aesthetic) quality
4: historical significance (intangible technique) relies on (1) time period and (2) before most everyone else
MP: identification and discussion of why a forged artwork can be of similar aesthetic, but is always of lesser artistic quality, than an original, alluding to those "intangibles" which make original pieces of work, original
Viewpoints: author, and Lessing
Tone: informative, mildly argumentative
Argument: forged works lack intangibles that original works always possess