LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 ToadKing
  • Posts: 18
  • Joined: Jan 17, 2021
|
#86427
ToadKing wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 10:24 pm Hi,

I negated (E) and did not fully understand why it is necessary. My reasoning was that the chef could have just put the instruction into the recipe as an added precaution, in which case their mussels would not necessarily come from the seafood market. Sort of like how a chef might use prewashed lettuce, but write a recipe where they instruct others to wash their lettuce beforehand because the chef does not know what kind of lettuce they have on hand/it wouldn't hurt to wash it again.

Thanks for the help!

NVM! I thought that the question was asking about the chef who wrote the recipe, not the one who is trying it out!
 0904erin@gmail.com
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Mar 11, 2022
|
#94336
Conclusion: I can skip this step (sprinkling corn meal to clean out sand)
Premise: because mussels available at seafood markets don’t contain sand.

Well, what happens if the mussels he is using are not from the seafood markets? Can he say that he could skip this step? We can infer that he is assuming his mussels are from those seafood markets.
 Adam Tyson
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5387
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2011
|
#94358
Exactly, 0904erin!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.