- Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:52 am
#96173
A Weaken answer doesn't need to completely destroy every aspect of an argument, Annabelle. All it needs to do is raise some doubts about the argument, and to raise more doubts than any other answer choice. Answer B does raise those doubts by suggesting that in at least some cases, lawyers are already doing this thing that the author claims is a new burden.
I didn't see answer D having that impact described in the original explanation, but it also doesn't do anything to hurt the author's argument because the author never claimed anything about the fees being higher.
I didn't see answer D having that impact described in the original explanation, but it also doesn't do anything to hurt the author's argument because the author never claimed anything about the fees being higher.
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/LSATadam
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/LSATadam