LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 annabelle.swift
  • Posts: 54
  • Joined: Sep 01, 2021
|
#96556
I see why B is correct and why the other answers are wrong, but how do we know that the conclusion of the stimulus is causal rather than conditional?

I diagrammed the stimulus conclusion as Training :arrow: Well-behaved. Isn't the author saying that if a dog is trained, then it will be well-behaved?
 Adam Tyson
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5400
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2011
|
#97243
The premises are conditional, but the conclusion uses the phrase "accounts for," which is a causal indicator. It's more active than conditional reasoning, in that it tells us what is responsible for, or leads to, the effect. If the argument were to be purely conditional, the conclusion would have had to stay more passive, something like "thus these Labrador retrievers must have been trained."

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.