- Wed Aug 10, 2022 4:56 pm
#96669
Yes, if you take the argument on its terms, as in read it literally, there is nothing in it that specifically states anything related to effects of a more widespread usage. In other words, the argument is confined to the actual act of wasting paper currently rather than what would occur in the future. Now, I agree that the argument begins with "increasingly," indicating that practice is becoming more widespread, but once again, this is an observation of the current state of affairs rather than a forecast or trajectory.
Now, in terms of C, this is based a reading that indicates that the final two sentences of the argument are really in support of the claim that the practice is immoral. Read by this standard, the argument proceeds by noting the wasted paper and comparing that to wasting paper in other contexts, i.e. exactly what C states the argument does.
Let me know if you have further questions on this.