LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

General questions relating to the LSAT or LSAT preparation.
 saranash1
  • Posts: 167
  • Joined: May 21, 2013
|
#9718
On page 140 on the powerscore test preperation book it says in Paragraph 2: downplay the pluses of the option you did not select but grant it a few points since it will have its positives ( how would go about granting it a few points) without looking like your contradicting your self?

Then it says play up the negatives of the choice, and then close with a quick summary that restates your choice. (play up the negatives of what choice?)
 Nikki Siclunov
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1362
  • Joined: Aug 02, 2011
|
#9740
I imagine you are referring to the writing sample here. Conceding that an opposing view (or course of action) has certain benefits does not amount to self-contradiction. Some of the best arguments out there begin with a concession that an opponent makes some valid points - this not only shows respect for the opposing viewpoint, but also shows that you are fully engaged in the debate. That said, you need to defend the option of your choice by explaining why the alternative is not as attractive. A cost/benefit analysis must clearly favor your choice.

To answer your second question: you need to play up the negatives of the option you do not select, of course. You surely do not want to play up the negatives of the option you're rooting for :-D

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.