- PowerScore Staff
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Dec 06, 2013
- Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:45 pm
#98580
teddykim100,
That reasoning sounds good to me! Good job!
The fact that the stimulus says that the only food all three meals had in common was peppers doesn't mean the only THING they had in common with peppers, and any alternative cause that's not peppers (because that's the conclusion anyway!) or other food (because there is no other food in common) would be a serious problem for this argument. Monroe failed to consider those other things, including quantity.
Robert Carroll
That reasoning sounds good to me! Good job!
The fact that the stimulus says that the only food all three meals had in common was peppers doesn't mean the only THING they had in common with peppers, and any alternative cause that's not peppers (because that's the conclusion anyway!) or other food (because there is no other food in common) would be a serious problem for this argument. Monroe failed to consider those other things, including quantity.
Robert Carroll