- Mon Mar 06, 2023 9:27 pm
#99440
In order to answer this question, LeslyLSATinLA, we need to review the section of text to which the question referred. That's the studies mentioned back in the first paragraph, the ones that suggest that laypeople are bad at evaluating risks. The author describes those studies as "asserting that, although people apparently ignore mundane hazards that pose significant danger, they get upset about exotic hazards that pose little chance of death or injury."
Therefore, we need an answer that shows someone ignoring mundane behavior that is very risky, while being upset about dangers that are very rare, because that's what those studies are talking about.
Answer D does exactly that. We have someone ignoring the very real, ordinary danger associated with reckless driving, while being worried about something that is extremely unlikely to ever pose any danger to them.
Answer C is about someone paying attention to two different risks, and we can't be sure whether either of them is all that exotic. Is it weird to care about radon, or is that mundane? Is it strange to be concerned about smoking, or is that ordinary? And either way, this answer has someone concerned with both risks, rather than ignoring one while being overly concerned about another, which is what the studies illustrate.
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam